Analisa Manajemen Risiko IT Pada Sistem Informasi Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi dengan ISO 31000

Muhammad Rizky Dharmawan(1*), Muhammad Jazman(2), A Adam(3),

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau , Indonesia
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau , Indonesia
(3) PT Sumi Gita Jaya, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Information systems are very important for companies to do their daily work. This includes taking care of customer information, handling loans, and keeping track of how well projects are going. But even though information systems are helpful, relying on them more and more can cause problems, especially with data security. PT Sumi Gita Jaya has started using a Corporate Project Management Information System (SIMPP) to make projects run better and to help manage customer information. This research wants to find out the Risk Priority Number (RPN) value to help give advice on how to handle risks in the Company Project Management Information System (SIMPP). The research uses the ISO 31000:2018 method to measure how risky the system is. The steps include finding risks, looking at them closely, calculating the RPN, judging the risks, and deciding what to do about them. This research looks at the level of risk from highest to lowest and provides reviews, treatments, and suggestions for fixing problems caused by risks.

Full Text:

PDF

References


P. L. Bernstein, Against The Gods: The Remarkable Story Of Risk. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1996.

T. Aven And O. Renn, “On Risk Defined As An Event Where The Outcome Is Uncertain,” Journal Of Risk Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, Pp. 1–11, Jan. 2009, Doi: 10.1080/13669870802488883.

E. A. Rosa, “Metatheoretical Foundations For Post-Normal Risk,” Journal Of Risk Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, Pp. 15–44, Jan. 1998, Doi: 10.1080/136698798377303.

T. Parviainen, “Implementing Bayesian Networks For Iso 31000:2018-Based Maritime Oil Spill Risk Management: State-Of-Art, Implementation Benefits And Challenges, And Future Research Directions,” Journal Of Environmental Management, 2021.

O. A. Jannadi And S. Almishari, “Risk Assessment In Construction,” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., Vol. 129, No. 5, Pp. 492–500, Oct. 2003, Doi: 10.1061/(Asce)0733-9364(2003)129:5(492).

M. Labombang, “Manajemen Risiko Dalam Proyek Konstruksi,” Vol. 9, No. 1.

D. Gjerdrum And M. Peter, “The New International Standard On The Practice Of Risk Management – A Comparison Of Iso 31000:2009 And The Coso Erm Framework”.

D. Sari, “Manajemen Risiko Di Tempat Kerja (Risk Management In The Workplace),” Ssrn Journal, 2022, Doi: 10.2139/Ssrn.4080651.

Universitas Islam Indonesia, M. A. N. Wahyudien, And E. Kusrini, “Risk Management Berdasarkan Framework Pada Aktifitas Perusahaan Jasa Konsultasi Dengan Iso 31000:2018,” Teknoin, Vol. 26, No. 2, Pp. 127–140, Sep. 2020, Doi: 10.20885/Teknoin.Vol26.Iss2.Art4.

B. Barafort, A. Mesquida, And A. Mas, “Iso 31000‐Based Integrated Risk Management Process Assessment Model For It Organizations,” J Software Evolu Process, Vol. 31, No. 1, P. E1984, Jan. 2019, Doi: 10.1002/Smr.1984.

B. A. Rachmania And B. Purwanggono, “Rekomendasi Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Berdasarkan Iso 31000 (Studi Kasus Cv. Pelita Semarang)”.

B. A. Rachmania And B. Purwanggono, “Rekomendasi Penerapan Manajemen Risiko Berdasarkan Iso 31000 (Studi Kasus Cv. Pelita Semarang)”.

K. B. Mahardika, A. F. Wijaya, And A. D. Cahyono, “Manajemen Risiko Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Iso 31000 : 2018 (Studi Kasus: Cv. Xy),” Sebatik, Vol. 23, No. 1, Pp. 277–284, Jun. 2019, Doi: 10.46984/Sebatik.V23i1.572.

F. Kitsios, E. Chatzidimitriou, And M. Kamariotou, “Developing A Risk Analysis Strategy Framework For Impact Assessment In Information Security Management Systems: A Case Study In It Consulting Industry,” Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 3, P. 1269, Jan. 2022, Doi: 10.3390/Su14031269.

G. Purdy, “Iso 31000:2009setting A New Standard For Risk Management”.

“International Standard Iso 31000.”

P. K. Marhavilas, M. Filippidis, G. K. Koulinas, And D. E. Koulouriotis, “A Hazop With Mcdm Based Risk-Assessment Approach: Focusing On The Deviations With Economic/Health/Environmental Impacts In A Process Industry,” Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 3, P. 993, Jan. 2020, Doi: 10.3390/Su12030993.

E. Zio, “The Future Of Risk Assessment,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 177, Pp. 176–190, Sep. 2018, Doi: 10.1016/J.Ress.2018.04.020.

A. S. Rochman, “Muhammad Yusuf Sediyanto Kosmas Lawa Bagho Sutikno Andi Hafidah Tyas Wedhasari Tatan Sukwika Aep Saepudin Afriansyah”.

A. Wilyanto, A. J. Renaldi, E. Valentina, And R. Melinda, “Analysis Of The Implementation Of Operational Risk Management In Vegetarian Culinary Business,” No. 1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30645/jurasik.v10i2.902

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.30645/jurasik.v10i2.902.g876

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



JURASIK (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika)
Published Papers Indexed/Abstracted By:

Jumlah Kunjungan : View My Stats