Perbandingan Kompresi NTFS Terhadap Kompresi Lain dari Tingkat Kompresi dan Kecepatan Baca dan Tulis

Fadel Azzahra(1*), Rudolf Paris Parlindungan Sihombing(2), Mirza Uliartha Simanjuntak(3), Aqwam Rosadi Kardian(4),

(1) Politeknik Siber dan Sandi Negara, Bogor, Indonesia
(2) Politeknik Siber dan Sandi Negara, Bogor, Indonesia
(3) Politeknik Siber dan Sandi Negara, Bogor, Indonesia
(4) Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer Jakarta STI&K, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study aims to compare the read and write speed levels between NTFS compression and compression in software, both with the Lempel-Ziv algorithm and other algorithms. Results were retrieved by comparing the compression and decompression rates using the NTFS file system and the 7-Zip application which was performed using files with different file types and sizes. It is concluded that NTFS compression with process automation capability is quite good in terms of read and write speed, although in terms of compression level it is still not as good as compression in software. This research does not only compare one file compression algorithm to another, but also how the algorithm is implemented in different ways/media, in this case on the NTFS file system and on third-party software (7-Zip).

Full Text:

PDF

References


G. E. Blelloch, “Introduction to Data Compression *”, 2013.

A. Kiran, M. Mounika, and B. L. Srinivas, “Modern Lossless Compression Techniques: Review, Comparison and Analysis”.

A. Gupta, A. Bansal, and V. Khanduja, “Modern lossless compression techniques: Review, comparison and analysis”, in Proceedings of the 2017 2nd IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies, ICECCT 2017, Nov. 2017. doi: 10.1109/ICECCT.2017.8117850.

P. Sanderson and S. Forensics, “NTFS Compression-a forensic view”.

B. Yoo, J. Park, J. Bang, and S. Lee, “Study on a carving method for deleted NTFS compressed files”, in 2010 3rd International Conference on Human-Centric Computing, HumanCom 2010, 2010. doi: 10.1109/HUMANCOM.2010.5563317.

R. Irfansyah Putra and A. Aulia Rahman, “Perancangan Aplikasi Pengembalian Berkas Terhapus Pada NTFS”, 2015.

S. A. Hariprasad, “Comparative Study on Various File System Implementations on Different OS”, International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2021, [Online]. Available: www.irjet.net

R. Russon and Y. Fledel, “NTFS Documentation”. [Online]. Available: http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/info/ntfs.html].

B. M. Shafiei, F. Iranmanesh, F. Iranmanesh, and B. Branch, “Review NTFS Basics”, Aust J Basic Appl Sci, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 325–338, 2012.

M. Tripp and A. Capstone, “Carving Ntfs-Compressed Data Clusters And Efs Encrypted Files”, 2015.

V. Dhjaku and N. Xoxa, “Comparing NTFS File System with ETX4 File System”.

A. Bundele and S. E. Yedey, “Comparative study of File systems (NTFS, FAT, FAT32, EXT2, EXT3, EXT4)”, 2018. [Online]. Available: www.ijraset.com.

S. Putri, “Implementasi Algoritma Lz77 Dan Lzma Untuk Kompresi File Teks”, 2019.

C. Steinruecken, “Lossless Data Compression", 2014.

J. Alakuijala, E. Kliuchnikov, Z. Szabadka, and L. Vandevenne, “Comparison of Brotli, Deflate, Zopfli, LZMA, LZHAM and Bzip2 Compression Algorithms”.

Z. bin Tariq, N. Arshad, and M. Nabeel, “Enhanced LZMA and BZIP2 for improved energy data compression”, in SMARTGREENS 2015 - 4th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems, Proceedings, 2015, pp. 256–263. doi: 10.5220/0005454202560263.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30645/jurasik.v8i1.555

DOI (PDF): http://dx.doi.org/10.30645/jurasik.v8i1.555.g533

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



JURASIK (Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknik Informatika)
Published Papers Indexed/Abstracted By:

Jumlah Kunjungan : View My Stats